JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_tenth_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_ca10
decision or issuance date
2020-08-18
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
Concepcion supersedes any Mannie language that would restrict consideration of intervening legal or factual information; only the nonplenary, hearing, presence, explanation, and abuse-of-discretion propositions are adopted.
material limitations
Official published opinion reviewed. Only surviving nonplenary, hearing, presence, and review propositions are used; Concepcion controls intervening information.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

United States v. Mannie

Holdings used

  • A § 404 proceeding is nonplenary sentence modification; no hearing or presence is categorically required, the disposition is reviewed for abuse of discretion, and the record must supply a reasoned basis for review.

Material limitation

Binding only in the Tenth Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official published opinion reviewed. Only surviving nonplenary, hearing, presence, and review propositions are used; Concepcion controls intervening information. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

971 F.3d 1145 (10th Cir. 2020), 971 F.3d 1155–58: https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/010110393562.pdf

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIR10-002