JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_eleventh_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_ca11
decision or issuance date
2003-04-14
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Official published opinion reviewed. Only the COA proposition is adopted; later Supreme Court law controls saving-clause merits.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

Sawyer v. Holder

Holdings used

  • By negative implication from § 2253(c)(1)(B), a federal prisoner proceeding under § 2241 does not need a COA.

Material limitation

Binding only in the Eleventh Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official published opinion reviewed. Only the COA proposition is adopted; later Supreme Court law controls saving-clause merits. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

326 F.3d 1363 (11th Cir. 2003), 326 F.3d 1364 n.3: https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/200116398.pdf

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIR11-005