JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_eleventh_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_ca11
decision or issuance date
2023-03-23
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Official published opinion reviewed. The court still must consider nonfrivolous arguments, and the opinion does not guarantee a reduction.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

United States v. Williams

Holdings used

  • Denial is reviewed for abuse of discretion; no reduction is compelled above a revised maximum, § 404 is not a collateral-attack vehicle, and a brief explanation evident from the record may suffice.

Material limitation

Binding only in the Eleventh Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official published opinion reviewed. The court still must consider nonfrivolous arguments, and the opinion does not guarantee a reduction. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

63 F.4th 908 (11th Cir. 2023), 63 F.4th 912–14: https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202112877.pdf

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIR11-004