JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_second_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_ca2
decision or issuance date
2003-02-26
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Published precedential full opinion reviewed from a public reporter reproduction after no stable historical official opinion file was located. No fixed explanation length, merits presumption, or changed-circumstances rule is inferred.

Open recorded mirror (not the official host) ↗

Linked modules

United States v. Gammarano

Holdings used

  • A court deciding modification or early termination must consider the listed statutory factors, but need not make separate findings on each when the statement and record show consideration.

Material limitation

Binding only in the Second Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Published precedential full opinion reviewed from a public reporter reproduction after no stable historical official opinion file was located. No fixed explanation length, merits presumption, or changed-circumstances rule is inferred. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

321 F.3d 311 (2d Cir. 2003), 321 F.3d 315–16: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/781046/united-states-v-john-gammarano/

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIR2-005