JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_fourth_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_ca4
decision or issuance date
1999-08-10
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Official published opinion reviewed. The decision does not create an entitlement to early termination and keeps a challenge to the original sentence in the procedurally proper direct or collateral review vehicle.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

United States v. Pregent

Holdings used

  • Section 3583(e)(1) ordinarily permits a broad conduct and interest-of-justice inquiry but is not a mechanism to collaterally attack the original unappealed sentence.

Material limitation

Binding only in the Fourth Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official published opinion reviewed. The decision does not create an entitlement to early termination and keeps a challenge to the original sentence in the procedurally proper direct or collateral review vehicle. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

190 F.3d 279 (4th Cir. 1999), 190 F.3d 282–83: https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/Published/986309.P.pdf

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIR4-004