JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_sixth_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_ca6
decision or issuance date
2004-01-14
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Official published opinion reviewed. Federal court-martial posture; the custody-source distinction and correct proceeding classification are preserved.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

Witham v. United States

Holdings used

  • No COA is required for a § 2241 appeal where detention arises from federal process; the state-process and § 2255 categories remain distinct.

Material limitation

Binding only in the Sixth Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official published opinion reviewed. Federal court-martial posture; the custody-source distinction and correct proceeding classification are preserved. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

355 F.3d 501 (6th Cir. 2004), 355 F.3d 504: https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/04a0016p-06.pdf

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIR6-003