JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_seventh_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_ca7
decision or issuance date
2024-02-20
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Official published opinion reviewed. The opinion prescribes no fixed explanation length and does not require a sentence reduction.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

United States v. Williams

Holdings used

  • Explanation adequacy is context dependent; a materially changed record and new nonfrivolous arguments cannot be answered by effectively repeating an earlier order without showing consideration.

Material limitation

Binding only in the Seventh Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official published opinion reviewed. The opinion prescribes no fixed explanation length and does not require a sentence reduction. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

93 F.4th 389 (7th Cir. 2024), 93 F.4th 391–94: https://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/OpinionsWeb/processWebInputExternal.pl?Path=Y2024%2FD02-20%2FC%3A23-2313%3AJ%3AWood%3Aaut%3AT%3AfnOp%3AN%3A3170766%3AS%3A0&Submit=Display

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIR7-002