---
title: "Madley v. U.S. Parole Commission"
citation: "278 F.3d 1306 (D.C. Cir. 2002)"
authority_id: "AUTH-CADC-MADLEY-278-F3D-1306"
authority_type: "case"
jurisdiction: "federal_dc_circuit"
precedential_status: "binding_in_cadc"
official_url: "https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinions/docs/2002/01/00-5226a.txt"
url: "https://jason93.com/legal/federal-process/authorities/AUTH-CADC-MADLEY-278-F3D-1306/"
legal_review: "2026-08-25"
links_checked: "2026-10-15"
links_available: 1
links_checked_count: 1
license: "CC BY 4.0"
---

# Madley v. U.S. Parole Commission

## Holdings used

- D.C. Superior Court process is treated as state-court process for § 2253(c)(1)(A), so a COA is required for the resulting § 2241 appeal.

## Material limitation

Binding only in the D.C. Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official court archive location and published full-text mirror reviewed. This custody-source exception prevents extending Sugarman's federal-prisoner rule to D.C. Superior Court judgments. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

## Official source and pinpoints

278 F.3d 1306 (D.C. Cir. 2002), 278 F.3d 1308–10: <https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinions/docs/2002/01/00-5226a.txt>

## Linked claims

- `CLM-CIRDC-002`


## Used in

- [D.C. Circuit Overlay](https://jason93.com/legal/federal-process/modules/95-circuit-overlays/dc-circuit.md)
