JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_dc_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_cadc
decision or issuance date
2024-06-14
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Official published opinion and GovInfo copy reviewed. The court did not resolve the distinct sentencing-package question and did not require a reduction.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

United States v. Smith

Holdings used

  • Absent legal error, review of a § 404 denial is not overly searching; a sufficiently reasoned record can sustain denial, and a sentence above the revised maximum does not itself compel reduction.

Material limitation

Binding only in the D.C. Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official published opinion and GovInfo copy reviewed. The court did not resolve the distinct sentencing-package question and did not require a reduction. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

104 F.4th 314 (D.C. Cir. 2024), 104 F.4th 333–35: https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinions/docs/2024/06/22-3033-2059841.pdf

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIRDC-001