JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_dc_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_cadc
decision or issuance date
1999-04-02
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Official court-hosted opinion text and public full-text mirror reviewed. The holding is limited to federal-process custody and must be read with Madley's D.C. Superior Court distinction.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

Sugarman v. Pitzer

Holdings used

  • A federal prisoner appealing denial of a § 2241 petition does not need a COA.

Material limitation

Binding only in the D.C. Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official court-hosted opinion text and public full-text mirror reviewed. The holding is limited to federal-process custody and must be read with Madley's D.C. Superior Court distinction. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

170 F.3d 1145 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (per curiam), 170 F.3d 1146: https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinions/docs/1999/04/98-5522a.txt

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIRDC-002