--- title: "United States v. Wilson" citation: "77 F.4th 837 (D.C. Cir. 2023)" authority_id: "AUTH-CADC-WILSON-77-F4TH-837" authority_type: "case" jurisdiction: "federal_dc_circuit" precedential_status: "binding_in_cadc" official_url: "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caDC-21-03074/pdf/USCOURTS-caDC-21-03074-0.pdf" url: "https://jason93.com/legal/federal-process/authorities/AUTH-CADC-WILSON-77-F4TH-837/" legal_review: "2026-08-25" links_checked: "2026-10-15" links_available: 1 links_checked_count: 1 license: "CC BY 4.0" --- # United States v. Wilson ## Holdings used - The filing prerequisite is a nonjurisdictional claim-processing rule; the court expressly declined to decide whether issue exhaustion applies. ## Material limitation Binding only in the D.C. Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official GovInfo copy of the published opinion reviewed. Issue exhaustion is expressly unresolved; the opinion's separate change-in-law analysis is excluded from this procedural claim. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run. ## Official source and pinpoints 77 F.4th 837 (D.C. Cir. 2023), 77 F.4th 842–45: ## Linked claims - `CLM-CIRDC-003` ## Used in - [D.C. Circuit Overlay](https://jason93.com/legal/federal-process/modules/95-circuit-overlays/dc-circuit.md)