--- title: "Jones v. Hendrix" citation: "599 U.S. 465 (2023)" authority_id: "AUTH-SCOTUS-JONES-HENDRIX-599-US-465" authority_type: "case" jurisdiction: "federal_nationwide" precedential_status: "binding" official_url: "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/599us1r42_2b35.pdf" url: "https://jason93.com/legal/federal-process/authorities/AUTH-SCOTUS-JONES-HENDRIX-599-US-465/" legal_review: "2026-08-25" links_checked: "2026-10-15" links_available: 1 links_checked_count: 1 license: "CC BY 4.0" --- # Jones v. Hendrix ## Holding or rule used Section 2255(e) does not permit an intervening statutory-interpretation claim to circumvent § 2255(h); the clause concerns unusual remedial unavailability and other detention challenges. ## Material limitation Use only for the bounded proposition in the linked modules. The actual custody, filing posture, respondent, district, circuit law, administrative record, continuing injury, merits, and relief remain separate where identified. ## Official source and pinpoints 599 U.S. 465 (2023), 599 U.S. 471–80: ## Used in - [28 U.S.C. § 2241 — Filing, Custodian, District, and Administrative Exhaustion](https://jason93.com/legal/federal-process/modules/60-post-conviction/2241-filing-jurisdiction-respondent-and-exhaustion.md) - [28 U.S.C. § 2241 — Section 2255(e) Saving Clause, Custody, and Mootness](https://jason93.com/legal/federal-process/modules/60-post-conviction/2241-saving-clause-custody-and-mootness.md) - [Supreme Court and Nationwide Floor](https://jason93.com/legal/federal-process/modules/95-circuit-overlays/supreme-court.md)