--- title: "United States v. Mauro" citation: "436 U.S. 340 (1978)" authority_id: "AUTH-SCOTUS-MAURO-436-US-340" authority_type: "case" jurisdiction: "federal_nationwide" precedential_status: "binding" official_url: "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-436/pdf/USREPORTS-436-340.pdf" url: "https://jason93.com/legal/federal-process/authorities/AUTH-SCOTUS-MAURO-436-US-340/" legal_review: "2026-08-25" links_checked: "2026-10-15" links_available: 1 links_checked_count: 1 license: "CC BY 4.0" --- # United States v. Mauro ## Holding or rule used A federal writ ad prosequendum is not itself a detainer, but can be an Article IV request after a federal detainer. ## Material limitation Use only for the bounded proposition and limitations in the linked canonical modules. Individual custody, computation, program, placement, administrative, circuit, and remedy facts remain separate. ## Official source and pinpoints 436 U.S. 340 (1978), 436 U.S. 349–61: ## Used in - [Detainers, Prison Discipline, Good-Time Consequences, and RDAP](https://jason93.com/legal/federal-process/modules/80-sentence-execution-and-bop/detainers-discipline-and-rdap.md)